Boykin v. State

96 Ala. 16
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WALKEB, J.

Tbe act of tbe General Assembly wbiob is found in Acts of Ala. 1888-9, pp. 731 to 738, was admitted in evidence to prove that tbe Mobile Street Bailway Company is a corporation. Tbe act expressly recognizes that company as an existing corporation. Section 14 of tbe act ratines and confirms tbe organization of tbe company, originally made under its act of incorporation, and expressly declares tbe company to be a legal corporation. Nothing further remained to be done under tbe act to complete tbe incorporation. Tbe act as offered was competent evidence of tbe existence of tbe corporation. — Talladega Ins. Co. v. Sanders, 43 Ala. 136; Johnson v. The State, 73 Ala. 483; Angell & Ames on Corporations, (7th Ed.) § 635. Tbe record presents no other question.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boykin v. State, 96 Ala. 16 (Ala. 1892).

96 Ala. 16 (Boykin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speaker v. State
75 So. 178 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
West v. State
53 So. 277 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)