Boykin v. State

96 Ala. 16
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 Ala. 16 (Boykin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boykin v. State, 96 Ala. 16 (Ala. 1892).

Opinion

WALKEB, J.

Tbe act of tbe General Assembly wbiob is found in Acts of Ala. 1888-9, pp. 731 to 738, was admitted in evidence to prove that tbe Mobile Street Bailway Company is a corporation. Tbe act expressly recognizes that company as an existing corporation. Section 14 of tbe act ratines and confirms tbe organization of tbe company, originally made under its act of incorporation, and expressly declares tbe company to be a legal corporation. Nothing further remained to be done under tbe act to complete tbe incorporation. Tbe act as offered was competent evidence of tbe existence of tbe corporation. — Talladega Ins. Co. v. Sanders, 43 Ala. 136; Johnson v. The State, 73 Ala. 483; Angell & Ames on Corporations, (7th Ed.) § 635. Tbe record presents no other question.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Speaker v. State
75 So. 178 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
West v. State
53 So. 277 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 Ala. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boykin-v-state-ala-1892.