Boykin v. Huntley

857 F.2d 1468, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10939, 1988 WL 96137
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 1988
Docket88-7522
StatusUnpublished

This text of 857 F.2d 1468 (Boykin v. Huntley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boykin v. Huntley, 857 F.2d 1468, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10939, 1988 WL 96137 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

857 F.2d 1468
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Grady BOYKIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Joseph HUNTLEY, Superintendent, North Carolina Department of
Corrections, Rutherford County; Lacy J.
Thornburg, Attorney General of the State
of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-7522.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 26, 1988.
Decided: Aug. 10, 1988.

William David Dannelly, Denise Smith Cline (Moore & Van Allen), for appellant.

Richard Norwood League (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Grady Boykin seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Boykin v. Huntley, C/A No. 86-1050-HC (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 F.2d 1468, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10939, 1988 WL 96137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boykin-v-huntley-ca4-1988.