Boykin v. Capehart
31 S.E.2d 506, 205 S.C. 276, 1944 S.C. LEXIS 80
Opinion
The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Bellinger correctly disposed of all issues involved in the case. The decree of the Circuit Court, the order refusing a new trial, and the order confirming the survey and plat of the boundary line, set forth fully the history of the litigation. We are in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Bellinger in his decree and orders, and affirm the judgment of the lower Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boykin v. Capehart, 31 S.E.2d 506, 205 S.C. 276, 1944 S.C. LEXIS 80 (S.C. 1944).
31 S.E.2d 506 (Boykin v. Capehart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Hyman
606 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2004)
Fenzel v. Floyd
347 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Shelley v. Shelley
137 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1964)
The STATE v. Harreld
89 S.E.2d 879 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Southern Silica Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Hoefer
56 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
Sou. Silica Mining Mfg. Co. v. Hoefer
56 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)