Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Boykin v. Capehart

Boykin v. Capehart

31 S.E.2d 506, 205 S.C. 276, 1944 S.C. LEXIS 80
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 3, 1944
Docket15681
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 31 S.E.2d 506 (Boykin v. Capehart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boykin v. Capehart, 31 S.E.2d 506, 205 S.C. 276, 1944 S.C. LEXIS 80 (S.C. 1944).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Bellinger correctly disposed of all issues involved in the case. The decree of the Circuit Court, the order refusing a new trial, and the order confirming the survey and plat of the boundary line, set forth fully the history of the litigation. We are in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Bellinger in his decree and orders, and affirm the judgment of the lower Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Baker and Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne,-StukEs^ Tayeor, and Oxner concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Hyman
606 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2004)
Fenzel v. Floyd
347 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Shelley v. Shelley
137 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1964)
The STATE v. Harreld
89 S.E.2d 879 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Southern Silica Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Hoefer
56 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
Sou. Silica Mining Mfg. Co. v. Hoefer
56 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 S.E.2d 506, 205 S.C. 276, 1944 S.C. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boykin-v-capehart-sc-1944.