Boyington v. HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINES, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Boyington v. HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINES, INC.

709 N.W.2d 235, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 59, 2006 WL 322191

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 1, 2006·No. A05-2055·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 28, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 817 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 28, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 817 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

Boyington v. HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINES, INC., 709 N.W.2d 235, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 59, 2006 WL 322191 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

709 N.W.2d 235 (Boyington v. HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related