Boyette v. State
311 So. 2d 786, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120
Opinion
Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal and having heard oral argument we are of the view that the failure to ascertain a factual basis for defendant’s plea of guilty is not reversible error particularly where, as here, the defendant alleged no prejudice for failure to follow Rule 3.170(j), FRCrP. Accordingly, we affirm upon the authority of Estes v. State, Fla.App.1974, 294 So.2d 122; Hall v. State, Fla.App.1974, 303 So.2d 417; but see Lyles v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 299 So.2d 146.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyette v. State, 311 So. 2d 786, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15120 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
311 So. 2d 786 (Boyette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willis v. State
312 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Abercrombie v. State
311 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)