Boyette v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 708 So. 2d 349 (Boyette v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We treat this appeal from denial of a mandamus petition as a petition for writ of certio-rari. See Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Mark Boyette petitioned the Circuit Court for Leon County for a writ of mandamus, presenting certain challenges to an order of the Parole Commission which revoked his control release. During the pendency of the [350]*350circuit court proceeding, jurisdiction was relinquished to the Commission and an amended order of revocation was entered which cured certain defects in the original order challenged by petitioner. The Commission informed the circuit court of entry of this amended order and three days later the petition for writ of mandamus was denied.
We elect to construe the order denying mandamus as having done so because the original revocation order had been superseded by the amended order and the mandamus petition was therefore moot. We deny cer-tiorari. This denial, however, is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to challenge the Commission’s amended order through a habeas corpus petition in the appropriate forum.
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
708 So. 2d 349, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4268, 1998 WL 187463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyette-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1998.