Boyett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Boyett v. State

121 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 609

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 1929

Docket8 Div. 778.

StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 919 (Boyett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyett v. State, 121 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 609 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The appellant was convicted by the jury as charged in the first count of the indictment. This count charged that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, contrary to law.

The regularity of the record, upon which this appeal is rested, is the only matter presented for the consideration of this court, as there is no bill of exceptions in the transcript. The record is without error; there, fore the judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The appellant was convicted by the jury as charged in the first count of the indictment. This count charged that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, contrary to law.

The regularity of the record, upon which this appeal is rested, is the only matter presented for the consideration of this court, as there is no bill of exceptions in the transcript. The record is without error; there, fore the judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 919, 23 Ala. App. 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyett-v-state-alactapp-1929.