Boyes v. Coppinger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Boyes v. Coppinger

2 Yeates 277

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 15, 1798

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Yeates 277 (Boyes v. Coppinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyes v. Coppinger, 2 Yeates 277 (Pa. 1798).

Pincite

Opinion

By the court.

The affidavit on which a domestic attachment is grounded, has never been held to he conclusive. Such a doctrine would be attended with the most pernicious consequences. There seems no ground whatever to impeach the proofs adduced by the defendant; hut if any contrary proofs can be given, we will hear them. The giving notice to all the creditors, seems almost impracticable. The parties who have issued the process are hound to support it, when attached.

Attachment dissolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

The affidavit on which a domestic attachment is grounded, has never been held to he conclusive. Such a doctrine would be attended with the most pernicious consequences. There seems no ground whatever to impeach the proofs adduced by the defendant; hut if any contrary proofs can be given, we will hear them. The giving notice to all the creditors, seems almost impracticable. The parties who have issued the process are hound to support it, when attached.

Attachment dissolved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Yeates 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyes-v-coppinger-pa-1798.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack