Boyer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boyer v. State

910 So. 2d 426, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14721, 2005 WL 2292051

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 21, 2005

DocketNo. 4D04-3223

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 910 So. 2d 426 (Boyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyer v. State, 910 So. 2d 426, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14721, 2005 WL 2292051 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s challenge to orders of two trial judges denying his requests for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The first order, entered by Judge Makemson on December 13, 2001, summarily denied all but two of appellant’s grounds alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The second order, entered by Judge Conner on July 12, 2004, denied the remaining grounds F and I following a full evidentia-ry hearing.

Both orders set forth valid, detailed findings and conclusions supporting denial of relief. The findings made by both judges are amply supported by the record and by competent, substantial evidence. No error is found in the judges’ conclusions denying the motion. The orders are, therefore, affirmed.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s challenge to orders of two trial judges denying his requests for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The first order, entered by Judge Makemson on December 13, 2001, summarily denied all but two of appellant’s grounds alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The second order, entered by Judge Conner on July 12, 2004, denied the remaining grounds F and I following a full evidentia-ry hearing.

Both orders set forth valid, detailed findings and conclusions supporting denial of relief. The findings made by both judges are amply supported by the record and by competent, substantial evidence. No error is found in the judges’ conclusions denying the motion. The orders are, therefore, affirmed.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

910 So. 2d 426, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14721, 2005 WL 2292051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyer-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack