Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail Insurance
123 P. 742, 87 Kan. 293, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Kan. 442 →
Opinion
The petition for a rehearing filed in this case presents nothing, so far as the merits of the controversy are concerned, which requires further consideration. Therefore the petition is denied. Since, however, the loss and damage sued for were not claimed under the policy, attorney’s fees were not recoverable, and the judgment should be modified by striking out that item.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail Insurance, 123 P. 742, 87 Kan. 293, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 130 (kan 1912).
123 P. 742 (Boyer v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.