Boyer v. Moore

42 Iowa 544
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided March 24, 1876·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Adams, J.

Under the Eevision, where suit was brought before a justice of the peace of one county against a citizen of another and the defendant appeared, it was held that the appearance conferred jurisdiction. Post v. Brownell, 36 Iowa, 497. Under the Code the justice of the peace lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter in such case. Sec. 3507. Appearance, therefore, of the defendant does not confer jurisdiction. The defendant’s motion to change the place of trial was misconceived, but he was not prejudiced thereby. The defendant’s motion in the Circuit Court to dismiss for want of jurisdiction of the justice of the peace' should have been sustained.

Beveksed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyer v. Moore, 42 Iowa 544 (iowa 1876).

42 Iowa 544 (Boyer v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Ross
1935 OK 830 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co. v. Howell
109 N.W. 294 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
Porter v. Welsh
90 N.W. 582 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Thompson v. Thompson
90 N.W. 493 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Heath v. Halfhill
76 N.W. 522 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Ebersole & Son v. Ware
59 Iowa 663 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1882)
McMeans v. Cameron
49 N.W. 856 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1878)
Hamilton v. Millhouse
46 Iowa 74 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1877)