BOYER v. LAMAS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided December 1, 2020·No. 5:20-cv-05772·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRUCE BOYER, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-5772 : MARIROSA LAMAS, et al., : Defendants. :

ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2020, upon consideration of Bruce Boyer’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and pro se Complaint (ECF No. 2), it is ORDERED that: 1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2. The Complaint is DEEMED filed. 3. Boyer’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The dismissal is without prejudice to Boyer filing a new case only in the event his underlying conviction is reversed, vacated, or otherwise invalidated. 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOYER v. LAMAS, (E.D. Pa. 2020).

BOYER v. LAMAS (BOYER v. LAMAS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)