Boyer v. Kroger Limited Partnership

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MARLISE BOYER, ) Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 19-CV-60-SMY-MAB KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: Plaintiff Marlise Boyer’s pro se Complaint was dismissed without prejudice and with leave to file an amended complaint on April 4, 2019 (Doc. 5). Boyer was directed to file her amended complaint and a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis by May 6, 2019. The deadline was extended to June 7, 2019 on Boyer’s motion (Docs. 6 and 7). Boyer was warned that the failure to file the documents by the deadline would result in dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and/or failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has filed neither pleading. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 5, 2019

STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge