Boyer v. Finley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2007·No. 07-1882·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1882

JESSE E. BOYER, SR.; MARILYN L. BOYER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ANNIE LEE FINLEY; ROY FINLEY, Jr.; MICHAEL TAYLOR, Jr.; MICHAEL J. BLITCH; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ROBERT W. POLK, Attorney; ASHLEY SURVEY COMPANY; PATRICK R. WATTS, Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:07-cv-01868-DCN)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 18, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse E. Boyer, Sr., Marilyn L. Boyer, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jesse E. Boyer, Sr., and Marilyn L. Boyer appeal the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing their civil action without

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants’ motion to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Boyer v. Finley, No. 2:07-cv-01868-DCN (D.S.C.

Aug. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyer v. Finley, (4th Cir. 2007).

Boyer v. Finley (Boyer v. Finley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.