Boyer v. Boyer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Boyer v. Boyer

219 S.E.2d 252, 27 N.C. App. 422, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1874

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 5, 1975

DocketNo. 7521DC572

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 S.E.2d 252 (Boyer v. Boyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyer v. Boyer, 219 S.E.2d 252, 27 N.C. App. 422, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1874 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s sole contention is that the facts found by the trial court are insufficient to support the order adjudging him in contempt. We find no merit in the contention. The court [423]*423found, among other things, that defendant had sold a business that he was engaged in for $24,000, that he had received $10,000 of the money and that the balance of $14,000 was being paid to him at the rate of $1,000 per month. The court further found that defendant is an able-bodied man, able to be gainfully employed, and able to comply with the orders previously entered in this cause. We hold that the findings are sufficient to support the conclusion of law and adjudication that defendant is in contempt of court.

. Affirmed.

Judges Vaughn and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s sole contention is that the facts found by the trial court are insufficient to support the order adjudging him in contempt. We find no merit in the contention. The court [423]*423found, among other things, that defendant had sold a business that he was engaged in for $24,000, that he had received $10,000 of the money and that the balance of $14,000 was being paid to him at the rate of $1,000 per month. The court further found that defendant is an able-bodied man, able to be gainfully employed, and able to comply with the orders previously entered in this cause. We hold that the findings are sufficient to support the conclusion of law and adjudication that defendant is in contempt of court.

. Affirmed.

Judges Vaughn and Arnold concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 S.E.2d 252, 27 N.C. App. 422, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyer-v-boyer-ncctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack