Boydstun, Glenn Dale
This text of Boydstun, Glenn Dale (Boydstun, Glenn Dale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-64,922-02
GLENN DALE BOYDSTUN, Relator
v.
THE DISTRICT CLERK OF FANNIN COUNTY, Respondent
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. 19367 IN THE 336TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FANNIN COUNTY
The order was delivered per curiam.This is an original application for a writ of mandamus.
Relator contends that he filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the 366th Judicial District Court of Fannin County, but that the application has not been forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals even though more than thirty-five days have elapsed. Relator's contentions present a colorable claim to have prompt resolution of any grounds raised in such an application.
It is this Court's opinion that additional information is required before a decision can be reached. Therefore, the Respondent, District Clerk of Fannin County, is ordered to file with this Court within thirty days a response by submitting the record on such application or a copy of a timely entered order designating issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992), or by stating the nature of any applications filed by Relator such that they are not filed pursuant to Article 11.07, § 3, V.A.C.C.P., or that no applications by Relator have been filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this the 16th day of AUGUST, 2006.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Boydstun, Glenn Dale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boydstun-glenn-dale-texcrimapp-2006.