Boyden v. California

Supreme Court

Boyden v. California

386 U.S. 278, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 46, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2053

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. 57, Misc·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacaté the judgment and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring-dn the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacaté the judgment and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring-dn the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Boyden v. California, 386 U.S. 278, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 46, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2053 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 278 (Boyden v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related