Boyd v. YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE

301 S.W.3d 555, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. ED 92999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brittany Boyd (Appellant) appeals from the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Young America Insurance (Respondent) on Appellant’s claims for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay against Respondent, based on Respondent’s failure to provide uninsured motorist coverage under Appellant’s mother’s (Insured) policy, for injuries Appellant sustained while driving Insured’s car. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Tinch v. State Farm Ins. Co., 16 S.W.3d 747, 750 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE, 301 S.W.3d 555, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

301 S.W.3d 555 (Boyd v. YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peebles v. Director of Revenue
301 S.W.3d 555 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)