Boyd v. Woodfin

3 Stew. 357
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Stew. 357 (Boyd v. Woodfin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Woodfin, 3 Stew. 357 (Ala. 1831).

Opinion

By JUDGE PERRY.

The facts of this case, bring to the view of the- Court, the question as to the authority of a judge of any Court to supersede executions, other than those issued from his immediate Court. Although the law authorizes him to issue writs of certiorari and super-sedeas, it is only for the purpose of removing a cause from a justice’s jurisdiction, in order that the party complaining may have a trial de novo. The statute confers no authority other than that of a trial upon the merits, and the statute which gives the County Court nmhorit3r to super[361]*361sede its own executions, cannot be extended to issued by justices of the peace.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilleland v. Ware
4 Ala. 414 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1842)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Stew. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-woodfin-ala-1831.