Boyd v. Williams

56 A. 135, 70 N.J.L. 185, 41 Vroom 185, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 9, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 56 A. 135 (Boyd v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Williams, 56 A. 135, 70 N.J.L. 185, 41 Vroom 185, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The plea in this case was prepared and verified and duly mailed to- the clerk of the Supreme Court, in time for filing within the time limited by law. It was undoubtedly lost in the mails. The plaintiff entered judgment by default. Ender this rule much testimony has been taken, and we are satisfied that the defendant has a defence which he should be permitted to interpose and have passed upon by a jury.

The judgment will be opened for the purpose of letting the defendant in to plead, but the lien of the judgment shall remain as security for the satisfaction of any judgment the plaintiff may recover in the action. Mott’s Prac., p. 69, § 135. And upon the further condition that the defendants cause this rule to be entered in the minutes of this court within five days, and file their plea, and pay to the attorney of -the plaintiff the costs of the plaintiff on this rule and the court and clerk’s costs in the judgment by default within fifteen [186]*186days after said rule shall be so entered; in default of compliance with these conditions by the. defendants the judgment by default shall stand as entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regional Const. Corp. v. Ray
837 A.2d 421 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Reilly v. Perehinys
109 A.2d 449 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Lake v. Lake
182 P.2d 824 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1947)
Hallett v. Slaughter
140 P.2d 3 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Stainbrook v. Meskill
1915 OK 865 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
McLaughlin v. Nettleton
1909 OK 313 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Poff v. Lockridge
1908 OK 209 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A. 135, 70 N.J.L. 185, 41 Vroom 185, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-williams-nj-1903.