Boyd v. White Whale Restaurant

813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2271, 2002 WL 341053
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2002
DocketNo. 1D00-4939
StatusPublished

This text of 813 So. 2d 974 (Boyd v. White Whale Restaurant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. White Whale Restaurant, 813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2271, 2002 WL 341053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our earlier opinion, and affirm the final order of the judge of compensation claims on the authority of Jackson v. Hochadel Roofing Co., 794 So.2d 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Hochadel Roofing Co.
794 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
813 So. 2d 974, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2271, 2002 WL 341053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-white-whale-restaurant-fladistctapp-2002.