Boyd v. Village of Keeseville

14 A.D.2d 446, 221 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7347
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 A.D.2d 446 (Boyd v. Village of Keeseville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Village of Keeseville, 14 A.D.2d 446, 221 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Bergan, P. J.

In this personal injury action against a village based on a defective sidewalk, the complaint alleges compliance with section 341-a of the Village Law, which requires advance ‘ ‘ written notice ’ ’ of the ‘ ‘ condition ’ ’ by pleading the maintenance of a previous lawsuit against the village for an injury occurring two years before “ at the very same location on the very same sidewalk ’ ’.

It is further alleged that papers in proceedings to examine defendant before trial in that former action were served within a year before the injury which is the subject of this action.

If all this is true, as we must presume on a motion to dismiss the pleading, it could constitute a sufficient written notice of the “ condition ” to satisfy the statute, as the court at Special Term has held. The statute does not prescribe the form or content of the ‘ ‘ written notice ’ ’; and formal papers served on the village concerning the same dangerous condition could be such a notice as might meet the condition precedent to the maintenance of this action.

It is, of course, an open issue to be tried in this case, whether the notice sufficiently pointed to the “ same ” condition to which [447]*447plaintiff Jennie Boyd attributes her accident to meet the statutory requirement.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrington v. City of Plattsburgh
216 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Brooks v. City of Binghamton
55 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 446, 221 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-village-of-keeseville-nyappdiv-1961.