Boyd v. Tesemma

Fourth Circuit

Boyd v. Tesemma

675 F. App'x 334

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-6698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Andrew Boyd appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boyd v. Tesemma, No. 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 26, 2016 & entered Apr. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Andrew Boyd appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boyd v. Tesemma, No. 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 26, 2016 & entered Apr. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Boyd v. Tesemma, 675 F. App'x 334 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 334 (Boyd v. Tesemma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related