Boyd v. Stuttgart

84 F. 9, 28 C.C.A. 262, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2170
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 8, 1897
DocketNo. 851
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 84 F. 9 (Boyd v. Stuttgart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Stuttgart, 84 F. 9, 28 C.C.A. 262, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2170 (8th Cir. 1897).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question upon the merits in this case is whether J. A. Boyd, a judgment creditor of the Stuttgart & Arkansas River Railroad Company, or the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, the trustee for Certain bondholders secured by a mortgage made by. that company, is entitled to the superior lien upon its franchises and property. No citation was addressed to or served upon the trust Company, and upon that ground it has appeared, and made a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is granted upon the authority of Trust Co. v. McClure, 49 U. S. App. 43, 24 C. C. A. 64, and 78 Fed. 209; Dodson v. Fletcher, 49 U. S. App. 61, 24 C. C. A. 69, and 78 Fed. 214; and Trust Co. v. Clark, 83 Fed. 230.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLean v. Jaffray
71 F.2d 743 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
Marshall Field & Co. v. Wolf & Bro. Dry Goods Co.
120 F. 815 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Grand Island & W. C. R. v. Sweeney
103 F. 342 (Eighth Circuit, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. 9, 28 C.C.A. 262, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-stuttgart-ca8-1897.