Boyd v. State

56 S.W.2d 651, 122 Tex. Crim. 514, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 776
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 21, 1932·No. No. 15384.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It appears that appellant entered into recognizance on appeal. A copy of the recognizance has not been brought forward in the transcript. Hence we are unable to determine whether the recognizance under which appellant is enlarged meets the requirements of the statute. Where the appellant is enlarged, this court is without jurisdiction in the absence of a proper recognizance or appeal bond. Russell v. State, 119 Tex. Crim. 469,45 S.W.2d 622.

Appellant is granted 15 days from this date in which to perfect the record.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has *Page 515 been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 56 S.W.2d 651, 122 Tex. Crim. 514, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 776 (Tex. 1932).

56 S.W.2d 651 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grohske v. State
61 S.W.2d 847 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Grohoske v. State
61 S.W.2d 847 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)