Boyd v. State

545 P.2d 202, 92 Nev. 73, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 519
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1976
DocketNo. 8310
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 545 P.2d 202 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. State, 545 P.2d 202, 92 Nev. 73, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 519 (Neb. 1976).

Opinion

[74]*74OPINION

Per Curiam:

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the record contains substantial evidence to support his conviction. His 1969 prior conviction for robbery in another state was properly allowed into evidence. NRS 50.095. Error did not occur when the trial judge precluded defense counsel’s desire to read, during jury summation, an article from Time Magazine. Westenbarger v. State, 91 Nev. 478, 537 P.2d 1195 (1975). The inadvertent submission to the jury of a motor vehicle registration slip which had not been received in evidence as an exhibit, and to which reference never was made during trial, was, in the context of this case, harmless. NRS 178.598.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blake v. State
121 P.3d 567 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2005)
Wheatfall v. State
882 S.W.2d 829 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 P.2d 202, 92 Nev. 73, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-nev-1976.