Boyd v. State
This text of 545 P.2d 202 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[74]*74OPINION
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the record contains substantial evidence to support his conviction. His 1969 prior conviction for robbery in another state was properly allowed into evidence. NRS 50.095. Error did not occur when the trial judge precluded defense counsel’s desire to read, during jury summation, an article from Time Magazine. Westenbarger v. State, 91 Nev. 478, 537 P.2d 1195 (1975). The inadvertent submission to the jury of a motor vehicle registration slip which had not been received in evidence as an exhibit, and to which reference never was made during trial, was, in the context of this case, harmless. NRS 178.598.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 P.2d 202, 92 Nev. 73, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-nev-1976.