Boyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Boyd v. State

276 S.E.2d 261, 157 Ga. App. 61, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1678

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 8, 1981·No. 60937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction of burglary. His sole enumeration of error raises the general grounds. We have carefully reviewed the transcript and find no error. “As there was direct testimony identifying [appellant] as the perpetrator of the crimes with which he was charged, there was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury’s verdict.” Powers v. State, 150 Ga. App. 25 (1) (256 SE2d 637) (1979). “Issues regarding credibility of witnesses must be resolved solely by the jury. [Cits.] In this instance the jury, obviously, chose to believe the state’s witnesses.” Redd v. State, 154 Ga. App. 373 (1) (268 SE2d 423) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction of burglary. His sole enumeration of error raises the general grounds. We have carefully reviewed the transcript and find no error. “As there was direct testimony identifying [appellant] as the perpetrator of the crimes with which he was charged, there was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury’s verdict.” Powers v. State, 150 Ga. App. 25 (1) (256 SE2d 637) (1979). “Issues regarding credibility of witnesses must be resolved solely by the jury. [Cits.] In this instance the jury, obviously, chose to believe the state’s witnesses.” Redd v. State, 154 Ga. App. 373 (1) (268 SE2d 423) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Boyd v. State, 276 S.E.2d 261, 157 Ga. App. 61, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1678 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

276 S.E.2d 261 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related