Boyd v. State

787 So. 2d 162, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5894, 2001 WL 468136
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 2001·No. No. 2D01-1332·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Billy Boyd appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court properly concluded that the motion was untimely because it was filed more than two years after this court issued its mandate. See Beaty v. State, 701 So.2d 856 (Fla.1997). Thus, we affirm the trial court.

On the other hand, this court accepted Mr. Boyd’s motion for rehearing and entered an order denying his motion well after we issued mandate. He filed his postconviction motion within two years of that order. Although we should not have accepted and ruled upon his motion, having done so it is obvious that we misled him as to the time within which to file his motion. Accordingly, Mr. Boyd shall be authorized to file a motion for postconviction relief, which shall not be deemed untimely so long as it is filed within thirty days of the issuance of our mandate in this case.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and DANAHY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 787 So. 2d 162, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5894, 2001 WL 468136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 162 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giallanza v. Giallanza
787 So. 2d 162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)