Boyd v. State

588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12028, 1991 WL 253839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boyd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 578 So. 2d 718
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1991·No. No. 90-2408·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of burglary of a structure and simple assault. We affirm appellant’s conviction. See Arroyo v. State, 564 So.2d 1153, 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Croft v. State, 528 So.2d 1279, 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). However, the state concedes, and we agree, that the judgment must be reversed and remanded to permit the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect that burglary of a structure is a third degree felony, see § 810.02(3), Florida Statutes (1989), and simple assault is a second degree misdemeanor. § 784.011(1), Florida Statutes (1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12028, 1991 WL 253839 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

588 So. 2d 1098 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arroyo v. State
564 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Croft v. State
528 So. 2d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)