Boyd v. State

456 So. 2d 545, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1991, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15109
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 1984
DocketNo. 84-137
StatusPublished

This text of 456 So. 2d 545 (Boyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. State, 456 So. 2d 545, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1991, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

Affirmed on the authority of Gordon v. State, 449 So.2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) and Carter v. State, 452 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), without prejudice to the right of appellant to raise the issue of proper credit for time previously served in a motion under Rule 3.850, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. See Jensen v. State, 449 So.2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. State
452 So. 2d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Jensen v. State
449 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 545, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1991, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.