Boyd v. Schnell

209 Ill. App. 187
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided December 21, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and error, § 1060*—when error cannot be predicated upon giving of an instruction. Error cannot be predicated upon thev giving of an instruction where the record fails to disclose on whose behalf it was given. 3. Damages, § 200*—when instruction properly refused. An instruction excluding the element of profits held properly refused where there was no evidence tending to show profits and plaintiff made no claim therefor. 4. Appeal and error, § 1514*—when improper remarles of counsel are not reversible error. Improper remarks of plaintiff’s counsel in his closing argument to the jury were not reversible error where plaintiff’s recovery was limited to moneys actually advanced by him, in an action on the common counts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. Schnell, 209 Ill. App. 187 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

209 Ill. App. 187 (Boyd v. Schnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marcus v. Green
300 N.E.2d 512 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1973)