Boyd v. Ohio
418 U.S. 954, 94 S. Ct. 3230
Opinion
Ct. App. Ohio, Allen County. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is pro[955]*955hibited by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reyerse the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyd v. Ohio, 418 U.S. 954, 94 S. Ct. 3230 (1974).
418 U.S. 954 (Boyd v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Rodgers
327 A.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)