Boyd v. Mains
This text of 72 N.W. 269 (Boyd v. Mains) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an error proceeding to review a decree in equity of the district court of Pierce county.
[315]*3151. We notice only two assignments in the petition in error. The first is that the decree of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence. We have carefully examined the evidence, and, without setting it or any part of it out here, it must suffice to say that it amply sustains the decree.
2. A second assignment of error is “errors of law occurring at the trial.” Such an assignment as this presents no question to this court for review. (See Fremont, E. & M. V. R. Co. v. Root, 49 Neb., 900, and cases there cited.) The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 N.W. 269, 52 Neb. 314, 1897 Neb. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-mains-neb-1897.