Boyd v. Lv Metro. Police Detention Ctr.

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: November 18, 2014
• Docket: 66158
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Pan v. Eighth Judicial Die. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. The right to an appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Having considered the petition, 2 we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. Smith 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

AA; ,J. Hardesty

, J. Douglas

Ck J. Cherry

cc: Nikci Boyd

2 Petitionerdid not file an appendix in support of her petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4). Additionally, where, as here, resolving the issues presented by a writ petition requires the court to make factual determinations, the petition should be presented to the district court in the first instance. See Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A mer•