Boyd v. Laxer

Second Circuit

Boyd v. Laxer

45 F. App'x 48

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 6, 2002

DocketNo. 02-0063

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F. App'x 48 (Boyd v. Laxer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyd v. Laxer, 45 F. App'x 48 (2d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

In November 1997, Plaintiff Appellant Boyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Appellees. Boyd’s claims had previously been brought in state court, where they were rejected. The district court granted summary judgment on all claims in favor of the defendants. We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the court below.

We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find them meritless. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

In November 1997, Plaintiff Appellant Boyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Appellees. Boyd’s claims had previously been brought in state court, where they were rejected. The district court granted summary judgment on all claims in favor of the defendants. We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the court below.

We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find them meritless. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F. App'x 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-laxer-ca2-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack