Boyd v. Keith

954 S.W.2d 942, 330 Ark. 626, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 705
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 20, 1997
Docket97-991
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 954 S.W.2d 942 (Boyd v. Keith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Keith, 954 S.W.2d 942, 330 Ark. 626, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 705 (Ark. 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Stanley Frank Boyd, a prisoner in the Arkansas Department of Correction, states that on April 2, 1997, he filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Honorable Tom Keith, Carroll County Circuit Judge. The request sought copies of records allegedly in the files of the Circuit Court. The matter apparently remains pending before the Circuit Court. Petitioner Boyd seeks a writ of mandamus to cause Judge Keith to grant his request.

The Attorney General, on behalf of Judge Keith, has responded by denying that the request has merit rather than addressing the Circuit Court’s failure to act on the request.

The writ of mandamus is granted to require only that the Circuit Court act upon the request of Mr. Boyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2006

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
954 S.W.2d 942, 330 Ark. 626, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-keith-ark-1997.