Boyd v. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp.

162 So. 2d 519, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2982
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1964
DocketNo. 32895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 So. 2d 519 (Boyd v. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp., 162 So. 2d 519, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2982 (Fla. 1964).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause came before the court upon petition for certiorari filed by the claimant when the full commission reversed the order of the deputy commissioner awarding him compensation and dismissed the claim. After oral argument and careful study of the record we agree that the order of the deputy was deficient in specific findings of fact and therefore defective and should be reversed, but we think that the cause should be remanded to the deputy commissioner for reconsideration and further findings of fact in accordance with the requirements as delineated in Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla.1955) and Wiedman v. Daryl Products Corporation, 127 So.2d 448 (Fla.1961).

Accordingly, we quash the order of the commission with directions that the cause be remanded to the deputy commissioner for reconsideration and further findings of fact.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion. O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., dissent and concur with DREW, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Durrance
174 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 2d 519, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-hudson-pulp-paper-corp-fla-1964.