Boyd v. Halstead

817 So. 2d 1092, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8203, 2002 WL 1308180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 2002·No. No. 2D01-4277·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BLUE, Chief Judge.

We grant Gerald Boyd’s petition for a writ of certiorari and quash that portion of the trial court’s order abating the third-party complaint filed against him by Stephen and Mary Halstead. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the Hal-steads have not stated a sufficient claim for indemnity. See, e.g., Houdaille Indus., Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So.2d 490 (Fla.1979); Leggiere v. Merrill Lynch Realty/Fla., Inc., 544 So.2d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The trial court’s decision to also abate the claim against Boyd is inconsistent with its decision to dismiss the claim. See Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. Cent. Jersey Invs., Inc., 632 So.2d 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Petition granted.

GREEN and KELLY, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. Halstead, 817 So. 2d 1092, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8203, 2002 WL 1308180 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

817 So. 2d 1092 (Boyd v. Halstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kendall v. Gilmore
915 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)