Boyd v. Guthrie

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BREE TRO MERE! RAGED DOC #: NYJEE BOYD, DATE FILED: 10/28/2022 Plaintiff, -against- 7:22-CV-8549 (NSR) CORRECTION OFFICER CHARLES ORDER OF SERVICE GUTHRIE, et al., Defendants.

NELSON S. ROMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Nyjee Boyd, who is currently incarcerated in the Coxsackie Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages; his claims arise from events that allegedly occurred in the Sing Sing Correctional Facility (“Sing Sing”) while he was incarcerated there. He sues: (1) Correctional Officer Charles Guthrie; (2) Correctional Officer Asantewa K. Tulloch; (3) Correctional Sergeant Jose Candelario; (4) Correctional Officer Alexander; (5) Sing Sing Nurse Elizabeth Pemisi; (6) Sing Sing Disciplinary Hearing Officer “SORC [Marcia N.] Regisford”; (7) Sing Sing Superintendent Michael Capra; (8) Sing Sing Deputy Superintendent Elaine Velez; (9) Correctional Officer Vito G. Marsico; (10) Correctional Officer Rondy D. London; (11) Correctional Sergeant Martinez; (12) Correctional Officer Gonzalez; (13) Correctional Sergeant Gonzalez; (14) Correctional Officer Leon K. Lowe; and (15) Correctional Officer Felix Santiago Vasquez.

By order dated October 11, 2022, the court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 The Court directs service on all of the defendants, and directs all of them to comply with Local Civil Rule 33.2. DISCUSSION A. Service on all of the defendants Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the

Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on all of the defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each of the defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons for each of the defendants and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon all of the defendants.

If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee, even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss this action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. Local Civil Rule 33.2 Local Civil Rule 33.2, which requires defendants in certain types of prisoner cases to respond to specific, court-ordered discovery requests, applies to this action. These discovery requests are available on the Court’s website under “Forms” and are titled “Plaintiff’s Local Civil Rule 33.2 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents.” Within 120 days of service of the complaint, the defendants must serve responses to these standard discovery requests. In their responses, the defendants must quote each request verbatim.* CONCLUSION The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for all of the defendants; complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for all of the defendants; and deliver all documents necessary to effect service on all of the defendants to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Court further directs the defendants to comply with Local Civil Rule 33.2 within 120 days of service of the complaint. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2022 White Plains, New York NELSON S.ROMAN United States District Judge

> Tf Plaintiff would like copies of these discovery requests before receiving the responses and does not have access to the website, Plaintiff may request them from the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit.

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

Correctional Officer Charles Guthrie Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Asantewa K. Tulloch Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Sergeant Jose Candelario Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Alexander Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Nurse Elizabeth Pemisi Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Disciplinary Hearing Officer “SORC” Marcia N. Regisford Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Superintendent Michael Capra Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Deputy Superintendent Elaine Velez Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Vito G. Marsico Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Rondy D. London Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Sergeant Martinez Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Gonzalez Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Sergeant Gonzalez Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Leon K. Lowe Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442 Correctional Officer Felix Santiago Vasquez Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562-5442