Boyd v. Davis

7 Mass. 359
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Mass. 359 (Boyd v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Davis, 7 Mass. 359 (Mass. 1811).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The referees have expressly negatived the plaintiff’s concession in the submission, that he had no other demand on the plaintiff than for money received; and that concession will, therefore, be no bar to his recovery in a future action, if he shall prove in such action that, by the defendant’s loches, the notes be longing to the plaintiff have become of no value to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Executors of Van Rensselaer v. Executors of Platner
2 Johns. Cas. 17 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Mass. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-davis-mass-1811.