Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided July 19, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-01375·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MAX. W. BOYD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 20-cv-1375-RJD1 ) COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DALY, Magistrate Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand to the Commissioner (Doc. 16). The parties ask that this case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence four remand (as opposed to a sentence six remand) depends upon a finding of error, and is itself a final, appealable order. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection Plan, 195 F.3d 975, 978 (7th Cir. 1999). Upon a sentence four remand, judgment should be entered in favor of Plaintiff. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-303 (1993). For good cause shown, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Remand (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. The parties agree that, on remand, the ALJ will evaluate the medical source opinions, whether Plaintiff’s impairments meet or medically equal a listing, Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity, whether Plaintiff could perform his past relevant work or a significant number of jobs existing in the national economy, and issue a new decision. Plaintiff applied for disability benefits in May

1 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). Doc. 8. 2018 (Tr. 156). While recognizing that the agency has a full docket, the Court urges the Commissioner to expedite this case on remand. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for social security benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing and reconsideration of the evidence, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. All pending deadlines

are moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 19, 2021.

s/Reona J. Daly REONA J. DALY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ill. 2021).

Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security (Boyd v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)