Boyd v. Clements

8 Ga. 522
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1850
DocketNo. 85
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ga. 522 (Boyd v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Clements, 8 Ga. 522 (Ga. 1850).

Opinion

By the Court.

Nisbet, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The 4th Common Law Rule of Practice does not apply to causes in Equity, and the complainant was not entitled to an amendment in this case as a matter of right.

[2.] Amendments to bills pending on the appeal, are not allowable but in the discretion of the Court; and when the pleadings are made up, and the issues joined, that discretion will not be exercised to grant amendments but upon special cause shown. Berry vs. Mathews, 7 Geo. R. 457. Georgia R. R. & Banking Co. vs. Milner & Co. 8 Geo. R. 315.

[3.] In this case, the cause shown is surf rise, and our judgment is, that the presiding Judge properly allowed the amendment, and also the continuance for the purpose of the amendment.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ga. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-clements-ga-1850.