Boyd v. City of Houston

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 95-20345 Summary Calendar

_______________________

CAROLYN W. BOYD, Pro Se, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS and CITY OF HOUSTON PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-94-2)

_________________________________________________________________

February 14, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons stated in its orders entered June 3, 1994 and April 25, 1995. In addition, we note Boyd’s failure to comply with this court’s briefing Rule 28.2.3, requiring page references to the district court record. Boyd’s inattention to this briefing rule alone would have justified rejection of her appeal. Moore v. FDIC, 993 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1993). Further, Boyd’s brief is devoid of a coherent legal argument for overturning the summary judgment.

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

AFFIRMED.