Boyd v. Borough of Wilkinsburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Boyd v. Borough of Wilkinsburg

38 A. 592, 183 Pa. 198, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 739

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 8, 1897

DocketAppeal, No. 68

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A. 592 (Boyd v. Borough of Wilkinsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boyd v. Borough of Wilkinsburg, 38 A. 592, 183 Pa. 198, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 739 (Pa. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There was no error in refusing plaintiff’s offers of evidence recited in the first and second specifications respectively; nor in sustaining objection to the evidence of plaintiff’s witness, S. H. McKee, recited in the third and last specification. These rulings of the court below are so obviously correct that neither of the questions involved requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There was no error in refusing plaintiff’s offers of evidence recited in the first and second specifications respectively; nor in sustaining objection to the evidence of plaintiff’s witness, S. H. McKee, recited in the third and last specification. These rulings of the court below are so obviously correct that neither of the questions involved requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A. 592, 183 Pa. 198, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-borough-of-wilkinsburg-pa-1897.