Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC

Fourth Circuit

Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC

668 F. App'x 541

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2016·No. No. 16-1626·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Don Boyd appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Boyd’s civil complaint against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Boyd v. Blue-stein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, No. 3:15-cv-04791-JFA, 2016 WL 1258326 (D.S.C. Mar. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Don Boyd appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Boyd’s civil complaint against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Boyd v. Blue-stein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, No. 3:15-cv-04791-JFA, 2016 WL 1258326 (D.S.C. Mar. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, 668 F. App'x 541 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

668 F. App'x 541 (Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.