Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

700 N.E.2d 1222, 92 N.Y.2d 885, 678 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2760
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 27, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 700 N.E.2d 1222 (Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 700 N.E.2d 1222, 92 N.Y.2d 885, 678 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2760 (N.Y. 1998).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion to compel the acceptance of an amended/supplemental bill of particulars and the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that those orders do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Empire State Building Associates v. Trump
700 N.E.2d 1222 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 N.E.2d 1222, 92 N.Y.2d 885, 678 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-bethlehem-steel-corp-ny-1998.