Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
700 N.E.2d 1222, 92 N.Y.2d 885, 678 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2760
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion to compel the acceptance of an amended/supplemental bill of particulars and the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that those orders do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 700 N.E.2d 1222, 92 N.Y.2d 885, 678 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2760 (N.Y. 1998).
700 N.E.2d 1222 (Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Empire State Building Associates v. Trump
700 N.E.2d 1222 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)