Boyd v. American Can Co.

249 A.D. 644, 291 N.Y.S. 205, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 249 A.D. 644 (Boyd v. American Can Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd v. American Can Co., 249 A.D. 644, 291 N.Y.S. 205, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order denying motion of the defendant American Can Company to dismiss the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Neither the can nor the key is inherently or imminently dangerous within the rule laid down in MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. (217 N. Y. 382). Each is an appliance in ordinary use and not ,an article which, if imperfectly constructed, is reasonably certain to cause injury to a person using it. The appellant-manufaeturer may not be charged with negligence where some unusual result occurs that cannot reasonably be foreseen and is not within the compass of reasonable probability. It is not enough that in the intended use injury is possible. (Cullem v. Renken Dairy Co., 247 App. Div. 742, and cases cited.) Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smolen v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.
276 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 74 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Cleary v. John M. Maris Co.
173 Misc. 954 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 644, 291 N.Y.S. 205, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-v-american-can-co-nyappdiv-1936.