Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company
This text of 241 F.2d 416 (Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court
Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 F.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-r-ringhiser-v-the-chesapeake-ohio-railway-company-ca6-1956.