Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

Sixth Circuit

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

241 F.2d 416

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 19, 1956·No. 12898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court

Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court

Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.

Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, 241 F.2d 416 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

241 F.2d 416 (Boyd R. Ringhiser v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related