Boyd McLauren, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin v. State of Mississippi;

CourtCourt of Appeals of Mississippi
DecidedNovember 5, 2019
DocketNO. 2018-KA-01617-COA
StatusPublished

This text of Boyd McLauren, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin v. State of Mississippi; (Boyd McLauren, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin v. State of Mississippi;) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyd McLauren, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin v. State of Mississippi;, (Mich. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 2018-KA-01617-COA

BOYD MCLAUREN, JR. A/K/A BOYD APPELLANT MCLAURIN, JR. A/K/A BOYD MCLAURIN

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAL WILLIAMSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER BY: GEORGE T. HOLMES ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: LISA L. BLOUNT DISTRICT ATTORNEY: ANTHONY J. BUCKLEY NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 11/05/2019 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE BARNES, C.J., McCARTY AND C. WILSON, JJ.

McCARTY, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶1. Boyd McLauren Jr. was convicted of a felony for his third offense of driving under

the influence of alcohol (DUI). He was sentenced to serve five years in the custody of the

Mississippi Department of Corrections and ordered to pay a $3,000 fine. Finding no

arguable issues for appeal, McLauren’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Lindsey

v. State, 939 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2005). McLauren was given additional time to file a

supplemental brief but did not.

FACTS ¶2. According to Erica Magee, McLauren’s ex-girlfriend, she and McLauren had a fight

early one morning that culminated in McLauren throwing a hatchet through her window.

Magee testified that McLauren, who had been drinking alcohol earlier, then drove away in

his white Ford F-150 truck. Magee called the local sheriff’s department. Officers responded

to her house and broadcasted a description of McLauren’s truck.

¶3. Deputy James Atkins was responding to the call at Magee’s house when he passed a

white Ford F-150 traveling in the opposite direction. Deputy Atkins followed the truck and

conducted a traffic stop. Deputy Atkins testified that McLauren was the sole occupant of the

truck. Deputy Atkins and another officer placed McLauren under arrest because he did not

follow the officers’ commands, and the report indicated McLauren was possibly armed with

a weapon. Deputy Atkins could smell “the strong odor of intoxicating beverage” emanating

from McLauren. McLauren admitted to Deputy Atkins that he had been drinking earlier.

¶4. The DUI officer who responded to the scene also smelled alcohol on McLauren. The

portable breathalyzer test indicated the presence of alcohol. Later, McLauren’s blood-

alcohol content was measured at .20 percent. Evidence of McLauren’s two prior DUI

convictions was admitted into evidence during trial. Because both prior convictions occurred

within five years of the third offense, McLauren’s third offense was automatically classified

as a felony. Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-30(2)(c) (Rev. 2013).

¶5. McLauren denied driving the truck. Rather, McLauren testified that a friend drove

the truck to him and that he was sitting in the truck with the engine off when law

enforcement found him.

2 DISCUSSION

¶6. Here, McLauren’s appellate counsel complied with the requirements set forth in

Lindsey. See Lindsey, 939 So. 2d at 748 (¶18). McLauren’s appellate counsel stated that he

reviewed the following: (a) the circumstances surrounding McLauren’s arrest; (b) any

possible violation of McLauren’s right to counsel; (c) the sufficiency of the indictment; (d)

the weight and sufficiency of the evidence; (e) speedy trial issues; (f) all rulings of the trial

court; (g) possible issues of ineffective counsel; (h) all jury instructions; (i) the admission or

exclusion of all exhibits; (j) possible prosecutorial misconduct; and (k) possible

misapplication of the law in sentencing. After examining the record, he found no arguable

issues for appeal.

¶7. Our independent and thorough review of the record has not revealed any arguable

issues that would warrant reversal. See Taylor v. State, 162 So. 3d 780, 787 (¶18) (Miss.

2015). Accordingly, we affirm McLauren’s conviction and sentence.

¶8. AFFIRMED.

BARNES, C.J., CARLTON AND J. WILSON, P.JJ., GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS, TINDELL, McDONALD, LAWRENCE AND C. WILSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindsey v. State
939 So. 2d 743 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2005)
Michael Taylor v. State of Mississippi
162 So. 3d 780 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boyd McLauren, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin, Jr. a/k/a Boyd McLaurin v. State of Mississippi;, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-mclauren-jr-aka-boyd-mclaurin-jr-aka-boyd-mclaurin-v-state-of-missctapp-2019.