Boyd-Gordon
This text of Boyd-Gordon (Boyd-Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) ) In re: RA VENIA BOYD-GORDON ) ) Civil Action No. 09-2227 (RJL) ) Plaintiff-Appellant ) )
MEMORDANDUM ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant filed this bankruptcy appeal on November 25,2009. At the
time of filing, plaintiff-appellant was directed to Rule 8009 of the Bankruptcy Rules of
Procedure, in particular the provision of that Rule which provides in part that "[t]he
appellant shall serve and file his brief within fourteen (14) days after entry of the appeal."
(See Notice of Appeal [# 1] Ex. 1 at 1.)
Unfortunately, plaintiff did not file any such brief. On January 11, 20 I 0, the Court
issued an Order which reminded plaintiff of her responsibility under Rule 8009 and
allowed her two additional weeks to file a brief. The Court's January 11 Order also
informed plaintiff that failure to comply could cause her action to be dismissed. In
response, plaintiff submitted a one paragraph request to keep her appeal alive. She has
failed to identifY any issues for appeal, however, and in the absence of any brief, the
Court is unable to consider her appeal further. Accordingly, due to plaintiffs insufficient response to the Court's Order, it is, this
~rFebruary, 2010, hereby
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Boyd-Gordon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyd-gordon-dcd-2010.